Try GOLD - Free
Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Fall 2024
To capitalize on emerging technologies while mitigating unanticipated consequences, innovation managers need to establish a systematic review process.

ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHnology promise to solve some of the world's most vexing problems, create new markets, and fuel economic growth. At the same time, they often raise ethical questions, and their deployment may lead to unanticipated adverse consequences that many companies are ill-equipped to identify or address.
For example, technology that enables the editing of human DNA is leading to new medical treatments, but the practice is also rife with unintended consequences. In 2018, an ambitious researcher in China ignored both the norms of the field and the law and altered human embryos' genetic material in an effort to confer resistance to HIV. The changes he made to the embryos' genes may be passed down to future generations, and their effects on human development are unknown.¹
Failure to fully consider possible outcomes when deciding whether and how to develop any technology can lead to negative consequences for companies, customers, and other stakeholders. In a 2024 case involving an AI chatbot, Air Canada's enthusiasm for automated customer service ran ahead of its understanding of the significant limitations of generative AI when it comes to accuracy of output. It fielded a chatbot that misrepresented company policy on bereavement rates in response to a customer inquiry and then denied the customer reimbursement because they did not follow the policy, refusing to take responsibility for providing bad information. When the customer sued and won, the headlines did little to burnish Air Canada's reputation for customer service.
When considering new developments that are truly at the forefront of applied science and technology, innovators are usually well ahead of regulations that might provide guardrails around commercialization decisions. So how do they decide when to proceed and when to hold back on releasing a new technology into the world?
This story is from the Fall 2024 edition of MIT Sloan Management Review.
Subscribe to Magzter GOLD to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
MORE STORIES FROM MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Listen
Translate
Change font size