Versuchen GOLD - Frei

Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation

MIT Sloan Management Review

|

Fall 2024

To capitalize on emerging technologies while mitigating unanticipated consequences, innovation managers need to establish a systematic review process.

- Tania Bucic and Gina Colarelli O'Connor

Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation

ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHnology promise to solve some of the world's most vexing problems, create new markets, and fuel economic growth. At the same time, they often raise ethical questions, and their deployment may lead to unanticipated adverse consequences that many companies are ill-equipped to identify or address.

For example, technology that enables the editing of human DNA is leading to new medical treatments, but the practice is also rife with unintended consequences. In 2018, an ambitious researcher in China ignored both the norms of the field and the law and altered human embryos' genetic material in an effort to confer resistance to HIV. The changes he made to the embryos' genes may be passed down to future generations, and their effects on human development are unknown.¹

Failure to fully consider possible outcomes when deciding whether and how to develop any technology can lead to negative consequences for companies, customers, and other stakeholders. In a 2024 case involving an AI chatbot, Air Canada's enthusiasm for automated customer service ran ahead of its understanding of the significant limitations of generative AI when it comes to accuracy of output. It fielded a chatbot that misrepresented company policy on bereavement rates in response to a customer inquiry and then denied the customer reimbursement because they did not follow the policy, refusing to take responsibility for providing bad information. When the customer sued and won, the headlines did little to burnish Air Canada's reputation for customer service.

When considering new developments that are truly at the forefront of applied science and technology, innovators are usually well ahead of regulations that might provide guardrails around commercialization decisions. So how do they decide when to proceed and when to hold back on releasing a new technology into the world?

WEITERE GESCHICHTEN VON MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Assess What Is Certain in a Sea of Unknowns

Understanding what won't change clarifies what might — and strengthens decision-making in volatile times.

time to read

13 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Ask Sanyin: Why Is It So Hard to Pull the Plug on a Project?

We're finding it difficult to wind down projects that no longer serve our priorities.

time to read

2 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Integrate Sustainability and Innovation to Find New Opportunities

Five common innovation practices can help leaders pursue sustainability as a growth strategy.

time to read

12 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

The Case for Quiet Corporate Activism

Leaders concerned that they will be penalized for championing sustainability and diversity can still sustain their commitments.

time to read

11 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

The Perils of Algorithmic Pricing

Some revenue management systems based on algorithms may lead to unintended collusion and antitrust violations.

time to read

9 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Broadening Future Perspectives at the Bank of England

Leaders at the U.K’s central bank sought to broaden their thinking about future risks and opportunities. Here’s how they built longer-term horizon-scanning capabilities and what they learned along the way.

time to read

9 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

How Nesting Changes Platform Strategy

Should your platform host another platform — or be hosted by one? Here's how to think through the choices.

time to read

14 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

Are You an Authentic Leader or an Authentic Jerk?

Leaders who are true to their values can inspire trust and respect, but not if \"being yourself\" becomes the problem.

time to read

13 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

How to Make Scenario Planning Stick

Developing future scenarios can deepen leaders’ strategic insights. Establishing scenario planning as an ongoing capability and reaping its full benefits require linking it to other processes.

time to read

16 mins

winter 2026

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

A Faster Way to Build Future Scenarios

This streamlined approach to scenario planning incorporates AI and helps managers navigate future uncertainties more efficiently.

time to read

13 mins

winter 2026

Listen

Translate

Share

-
+

Change font size