Gå ubegrenset med Magzter GOLD

Gå ubegrenset med Magzter GOLD

Få ubegrenset tilgang til over 9000 magasiner, aviser og premiumhistorier for bare

$149.99
 
$74.99/År

Prøve GULL - Gratis

Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation

MIT Sloan Management Review

|

Fall 2024

To capitalize on emerging technologies while mitigating unanticipated consequences, innovation managers need to establish a systematic review process.

- Tania Bucic and Gina Colarelli O'Connor

Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation

ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHnology promise to solve some of the world's most vexing problems, create new markets, and fuel economic growth. At the same time, they often raise ethical questions, and their deployment may lead to unanticipated adverse consequences that many companies are ill-equipped to identify or address.

For example, technology that enables the editing of human DNA is leading to new medical treatments, but the practice is also rife with unintended consequences. In 2018, an ambitious researcher in China ignored both the norms of the field and the law and altered human embryos' genetic material in an effort to confer resistance to HIV. The changes he made to the embryos' genes may be passed down to future generations, and their effects on human development are unknown.¹

Failure to fully consider possible outcomes when deciding whether and how to develop any technology can lead to negative consequences for companies, customers, and other stakeholders. In a 2024 case involving an AI chatbot, Air Canada's enthusiasm for automated customer service ran ahead of its understanding of the significant limitations of generative AI when it comes to accuracy of output. It fielded a chatbot that misrepresented company policy on bereavement rates in response to a customer inquiry and then denied the customer reimbursement because they did not follow the policy, refusing to take responsibility for providing bad information. When the customer sued and won, the headlines did little to burnish Air Canada's reputation for customer service.

When considering new developments that are truly at the forefront of applied science and technology, innovators are usually well ahead of regulations that might provide guardrails around commercialization decisions. So how do they decide when to proceed and when to hold back on releasing a new technology into the world?

FLERE HISTORIER FRA MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making

Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.

time to read

11 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases

Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.

time to read

11 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders

Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.

time to read

14 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability

Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.

time to read

10 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al

Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.

time to read

6 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

Aligning Strategy and Skills

\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.

time to read

1 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?

I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.

time to read

2 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots

Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.

time to read

10 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing

The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.

time to read

7 mins

Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review

A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy

Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.

time to read

16 mins

Fall 2025

Listen

Translate

Share

-
+

Change font size