
Several stories below the British Library's Magna Carta room, alongside a rumbling line of the London Underground, is a brightly lit labyrinth of rare and historic items. Past a series of antique rifles chained to a wall, past an intricate system of conveyor belts whisking books to the surface, the library stores an enormous collection of plays, manuscripts, and letters. Last spring, I checked my belongings at security and descended to sift through this archive a record of correspondence between the producers and directors of British theater and a small team of censors who once worked for the Crown.
For centuries, these strict, dyspeptic, and sometimes unintentionally hilarious bureaucrats read and passed judgment on every public theatrical production in Britain, striking out references to sex, God, and politics, and forcing playwrights to, as one put it, cook their "conceptions to the taste of authority." They reported to the Lord Chamberlain's Office, which in 1737 became responsible for granting licenses to theaters and approving the texts of plays. "Examiners" made sure that no productions would offend the sovereign, blaspheme the Church, or stir audiences to political radicalism. An 1843 act expanded the department's powers, calling upon it to block any play that threatened not just the "Public Peace" but "Decorum" and "good Manners."
"OMIT THE BUSINESS AND SPEECHES ABOUT FLYBUTTONS."
Hardly chosen for their artistic sensibilities or knowledge of theatrical history, the men hired by the Lord Chamberlain's Office were mostly retired military officers from the upper-middle class. From the Victorian era on, they scrutinized plays for references to racial equality and sexualityparticularly homosexualityvulgar language, and "offensive personalities," as one guideline put it.
This story is from the March 2025 edition of The Atlantic.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the March 2025 edition of The Atlantic.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In

Was Integration the Wrong Goal?
Why some mainstream Black intellectuals are giving up on Brown v. Board of Education

The Girls of Summer
PHOTOGRAPHS BY ZACK WITTMAN 23 The Girls of Summer WOMEN HAVE ALWAYS LOVED AMERICA'S PASTIME. IT HAS NEVER LOVED THEM BACK.

TURTLEBOY WILL NOT BE STOPPED
A profane blogger believes an innocent woman is being framed for murder. He'll do anything to prove he's right—and terrorize anyone who says he's wrong.

THE FEAR ECONOMY
How Trump is exploiting American capitalism for personal power

The Internet Can Still Be Good
Reddit, of all places, suggests how.

On Track
The time I spent working on the railroad changed the course of my life.

The Last Great Yiddish Novel
Chaim Grade's Sons and Daughters rescues a destroyed world.

THE ERA OF MIGHT MAKES RIGHT
In the MAGA vision of the national interest, America will be more like Russia, China, and Iran.

The Cranky Visionary
Albert Barnes believed in the liberating power of art—but you had to look at it his way.

KOSHER SALT IS ACTUALLY JUST BIG SALT
How did it become so popular?