Try GOLD - Free
The CEO Is Leaving. Now What?
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Fall 2022
A three-phase process can help your organization navigate the boss’s departure and transition smoothly into new leadership.

An increasing number of CEOs are deciding to leave their posts on their own terms in the wake of COVID-19, for factors ranging from burnout to wanting to move on to the next stage of their careers and lives. Others are simply coming to the end of their agreed-upon term in office. Most want to minimize disruption to the company and preserve a positive legacy, but best practices on how to navigate the last 100 days of a CEO’s tenure are an under-researched topic. Beyond the first step of the CEO and board agreeing to an orderly transition, including timing and financial terms, how should the CEOs and boards proceed?
A CEO’s last 100 days typically can be divided into three phases: preannouncement, when only the CEO, chair, and board are aware of the planned departure; a post-announcement phase, when the departure has been announced but the business carries on much as before; and a pre-transition period, when a successor has been picked but is not yet in office.
How an organization and individuals manage these phases is crucial to an effective transition and continued momentum for the organization. Get it wrong, and the dislocation from one leader to the next increases the risk of organizational disruption. For the departing CEO, reputation and business relationships are valuable assets to take on to the next stage of a career. But for many, the motivation is primarily emotional: a desire to make a success of the last chapter of their service to an institution, its people, and its customers.
This story is from the Fall 2022 edition of MIT Sloan Management Review.
Subscribe to Magzter GOLD to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
MORE STORIES FROM MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Translate
Change font size