Try GOLD - Free
A New Machine Learning Approach Answers What-If Questions
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Spring 2025
Causal ML enables managers to explore different options to improve decision-making.

Machine Learning is now widely used to guide decisions in processes where gauging the probability of a specific outcome — such as whether a customer will repay a loan — is sufficient. But because the technology, as traditionally applied, relies on correlations to make predictions, the insights it offers managers is flawed, at best, when it comes to anticipating the impact of different choices on business outcomes.1
Consider leaders at a large company who must decide how much to invest in R&D in the coming year. Using traditional ML, they can ask what will happen when they increase their spending. They might find a strong correlation between higher levels of investment and higher revenue when the economy is growing. And they might conclude that, since economic conditions are favorable, they should increase the R&D budget.
But should they really? If so, by how much? External factors, such as levels of consumer spending, technology spillover from competitors, and interest rates, also influence revenue growth. Comparing how different levels of investment might affect revenue while considering these other variables is useful for the manager who is trying to determine the R&D budget that will deliver the greatest benefit to the company.
Causal ML — an emerging area of machine learning — can help to answer such what-if questions through causal inference. Similar to how marketers use A/B tests to infer which of two ads is likely to generate more sales, causal ML can inform what might happen if managers were to take a particular action.2
This story is from the Spring 2025 edition of MIT Sloan Management Review.
Subscribe to Magzter GOLD to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
MORE STORIES FROM MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Listen
Translate
Change font size