Prøve GULL - Gratis
THE CHILDREN'S CRUSADE
The New Yorker
|August 07, 2023
In 1956, a Tennessee high school was desegregated; two years later, it was dynamited. What happened?

When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. Board of Education, on May 17, 1954, it was big news. The Times gave the story banner headlines and ten pages of coverage. The case had been before the Justices since 1952, and it was common knowledge that a decision had been in the works. Many people probably anticipated the outcome, although maybe not that the opinion would be unanimous. Everyone, though, had the same question: Now what?
There is a reason for all the Hogwarts-like trappings that surround the Supreme Court—the super-secret conferences, the ban on cameras, the fact that the Justices read their opinions from a dais, that they never hold press conferences, that they wear black robes. All this gravitas masks the reality that the Court’s powers are largely paper powers. When the Court issues an opinion, it is basically waving a wand in the hope that something will happen. As Alexander Hamilton put it, the Court “has no influence over either the sword or the purse.” The sword belongs to the executive branch, as does the Department of Justice, and unless an Administration is prepared to enforce the Court’s decisions the Court is almost powerless to see that they are carried out.
Denne historien er fra August 07, 2023-utgaven av The New Yorker.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA The New Yorker

The New Yorker
Coconut Flan
Somehow, after the plane landed though before Andrés and Daria reached the taxi stand, Daria's wallet went missing.
22 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
SEASON OF DISCONTENT
Gustavo Dudamel at the New York Philharmonic; \"Kavalier & Clay\" at the Met.
6 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
THE TALK OF THE TOWN
For someone openly campaigning to get a Nobel Peace Prize, Donald Trump has been going about it in an unusual way. Early last month, the President proclaimed in a press conference that the Department of Defense would thereafter be known as the Department of War. At the same briefing, the presumed new Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, promised that the armed forces will deliver “maximum lethality” that won't be “politically correct.” That was a few days after Trump had ordered the torpedoing of a small boat headed out of Venezuela, which he claimed was piloted by “narco-terrorists,” killing all eleven people on board, rather than, for instance, having it stopped and inspected. After some military-law experts worried online that this seemed uncomfortably close to a war crime, Vice-President J. D. Vance posted, “Don't give a shit.”
4 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
THESE BLACK BOOTS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE BLACK BOOTS
These have an almond toe.
2 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
LOCKED IN
Two murders, a strike, and an explosive year inside New York's prisons.
41 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
DON'T BLAME ME
Taylor Swift's new album eschews vulnerability for revenge.
6 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
CONTINENTAL DREAMS
African independence was a time of high hopes. What happened?
16 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
OUT OF OFFICE
Can a Prime Minister have work-life balance? Sanna Marin tried.
24 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
ALMA MATER
\"After the Hunt.\"
6 mins
October 13, 2025

The New Yorker
THE HAGUE ON TRIAL
Political intrigue—and a lurid scandal—rocks the International Criminal Court.
22 mins
October 13, 2025
Translate
Change font size