Intentar ORO - Gratis
May It Please the Court
The Atlantic
|September 2018
In more than a decade as a trial lawyer, I’ve watched in frustration as male attorneys rely on a range of courtroom tactics that are off-limits to women. Judges and juries reward men for being domineering— and expect women to be deferential. This cultural bias runs deep and won’t be easily overcome. I have the trial transcripts to prove it.
LAST YEAR, ELIZABETH FAIELLA took a case representing a man who alleged that a doctor had perforated his esophagus during a routine medical procedure. Before the trial began, she and the defense attorney, David O. Doyle Jr., were summoned to a courtroom in Brevard County, Florida, for a hearing. Doyle had filed a motion seeking to “preclude emotional displays” during the trial—not by the patient, but by Faiella.
“Counsel for the Plaintiff, Elizabeth Faiella, has a proclivity for displays of anguish in the presence of the jury, including crying,” Doyle wrote in his motion. Faiella’s predicted flood of tears, he continued, could be nothing more than “a shrewdly calculated attempt to elicit a sympathetic response.”
Faiella told the trial judge, a man, that Doyle’s allegations were sexist and untrue. The judge asked Doyle whether he had a basis for the motion. Faiella says that he replied that he did, but the information was privileged because it came from his client. (Doyle told me the information had, in fact, come from other defense attorneys.) Faiella called his reply “ridiculous.” She told me: “I have never cried in a trial. Not once.”
As Faiella listened to Doyle press forward with his argument, her outrage mounted. But she had to take care not to let her anger show, fearing it would only confirm what Doyle had insinuated— that she would use emotional displays to gain an advantage in the courtroom.
The judge denied Doyle’s request, saying, in essence, “I expect both parties to behave themselves.” Afterward, Faiella confronted Doyle in the hallway. “Why would you file such a thing?” she demanded, noting that it was unprofessional, sexist, and humiliating.
Esta historia es de la edición September 2018 de The Atlantic.
Suscríbete a Magzter GOLD para acceder a miles de historias premium seleccionadas y a más de 9000 revistas y periódicos.
¿Ya eres suscriptor? Iniciar sesión
MÁS HISTORIAS DE The Atlantic
The Atlantic
The First 18 Months
A Cabinet meeting with my son, who is exactly as old as the current administration
2 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
What Dogs See
To understand a painting, look for the canine.
10 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
Boy George
Finally, an action movie about Washington’s French and Indian War years.
5 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
Disneyland With No People
When I was 17, I worked at Fantasyland’s magic shop as a magician demonstrating Svengali decks, cups and balls, and the Incredible (their word) Shrinking Die.
4 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
THE REBELLIOUS ORIGINS OF AMERICAN SPORTS
FROM THE BEGINNING, PATRIOTISM AND PLAY HAVE BEEN INEXTRICABLY LINKED.
12 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
Queen of the Skies
The Boeing 747, the world’s first jumbo jet, has started its final descent.
18 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
HOW TO TELL THE AMERICAN STORY
Finding a common history that’s both unsparing and unifying has proved all but impossible in recent years. It shouldn’t be.
17 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s American Horror Story
The author wrote a tale that challenged the nation’s founding myths. Then it disappeared.
13 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
The Surprising, Liberating History of Marriage
To find a future for the institution, Stephanie Coontz turns to its wildly varying past.
11 mins
July 2026
The Atlantic
USE IT OR LOSE IT
Freedom of speech, and of the press, can be guaranteed only if Americans exercise their rights.
8 mins
July 2026
Translate
Change font size
