May It Please the Court
The Atlantic
|September 2018
In more than a decade as a trial lawyer, I’ve watched in frustration as male attorneys rely on a range of courtroom tactics that are off-limits to women. Judges and juries reward men for being domineering— and expect women to be deferential. This cultural bias runs deep and won’t be easily overcome. I have the trial transcripts to prove it.
LAST YEAR, ELIZABETH FAIELLA took a case representing a man who alleged that a doctor had perforated his esophagus during a routine medical procedure. Before the trial began, she and the defense attorney, David O. Doyle Jr., were summoned to a courtroom in Brevard County, Florida, for a hearing. Doyle had filed a motion seeking to “preclude emotional displays” during the trial—not by the patient, but by Faiella.
“Counsel for the Plaintiff, Elizabeth Faiella, has a proclivity for displays of anguish in the presence of the jury, including crying,” Doyle wrote in his motion. Faiella’s predicted flood of tears, he continued, could be nothing more than “a shrewdly calculated attempt to elicit a sympathetic response.”
Faiella told the trial judge, a man, that Doyle’s allegations were sexist and untrue. The judge asked Doyle whether he had a basis for the motion. Faiella says that he replied that he did, but the information was privileged because it came from his client. (Doyle told me the information had, in fact, come from other defense attorneys.) Faiella called his reply “ridiculous.” She told me: “I have never cried in a trial. Not once.”
As Faiella listened to Doyle press forward with his argument, her outrage mounted. But she had to take care not to let her anger show, fearing it would only confirm what Doyle had insinuated— that she would use emotional displays to gain an advantage in the courtroom.
The judge denied Doyle’s request, saying, in essence, “I expect both parties to behave themselves.” Afterward, Faiella confronted Doyle in the hallway. “Why would you file such a thing?” she demanded, noting that it was unprofessional, sexist, and humiliating.
Diese Geschichte stammt aus der September 2018-Ausgabe von The Atlantic.
Abonnieren Sie Magzter GOLD, um auf Tausende kuratierter Premium-Geschichten und über 9.000 Zeitschriften und Zeitungen zuzugreifen.
Sie sind bereits Abonnent? Anmelden
WEITERE GESCHICHTEN VON The Atlantic
The Atlantic
You Had to Be There
An emerging field of history asks if we can ever really understand how our forebears experienced love, anger, fear, and sorrow.
23 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
By the Horns
The week before the biggest bullfight of her career, in Cádiz, Spain, this past July, 24-year-old Miriam Cabas posted a carefully produced video on Instagram.
1 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
The New German War Machine
After World War II, Germany embraced pacifism as a form of atonement. Now the country is arming itself again.
18 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
The Eloquence
The prime minister was watching a disaster movie when we found him.
4 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
What's for Dinner, Mom?
The women who want to change the way America eats
12 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
How Terror Works
A 1947 German novel explores the sometimes corrosive, sometimes energizing nature of fear.
8 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
Yesterday's Idea of a Modern Man
Sam Shepard, a self-made cowboy, was also a poet of masculine angst.
7 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
ACCOMMODATION NATION
America's colleges have an extra-time-on-tests problem.
11 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
Respect the Drummer
A new history of rock, told through its overlooked heroes
5 mins
January 2026
The Atlantic
THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN SCIENCE
WHY IS ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. SO CONVINCED HE'S RIGHT?
42 mins
January 2026
Translate
Change font size
