Bangladesh's anti-Yunus wave: A tale of democratic disillusionment

NINE months ago, Bangladesh seemed to be basking in the sunlit uplands of promise and reform. Today, that same horizon is cloaked in a gathering storm of disenchantment.

- 

The protagonist of this tragicomic reversal is none other than Nobel Laureate Dr Muhammad Yunus, whose ascent to interim leadership had been hailed as a beacon of hope in the aftermath of the July uprising.

Alas, the euphoric optimism that once accompanied his stewardship has now metamorphosed into a widespread disillusionment, manifesting in an unmistakable anti-Yunus sentiment that now pervades the streets, the institutions, and the collective psyche of the nation.

The chief advisor of the interim government, a mantle donned by Dr Yunus in the wake of broad-based endorsement from civil society, political parties, and the military, now finds himself grappling with an existential crisis. Recently, he even alluded to the possibility of resigning-an act born out of sheer frustration with the worsening political quagmire that envelops the country.

One could argue that the malaise he now finds so unpalatable is, in fact, the bitter fruit of the very seeds he sowed.

This interim regime was conceived with two noble mandates: to administer the country's affairs with competence and impartiality, and to organise credible elections that would restore democratic order. The expectations, lofty as they were, were matched by the confidence reposed in Yunus.

Yet, from the moment he began articulating his grand vision for reform, a chasm began to open up between the ruling elite and the very constituencies that had welcomed his leadership. That chasm, now a yawning abyss, has been further deepened by policies deemed unilateral, decisions perceived as authoritarian, and legislative overreach that has alarmed not only domestic stakeholders but also international watchdogs.