Justices question parties' funding limits

The Supreme Court's conservatives appear ready to strike down a Watergate-era law.

- BY DAVID G. SAVAGE

The Supreme Court's conservatives signaled Tuesday they are likely to rule for Republicans and President Trump by throwing out a Watergate-era limit on campaign funding by political parties.

The court has repeatedly said campaign money is protected as free speech, and the new ruling could allow parties to support their candidate's campaigns with help from wealthy donors.

For the second day in a row, Trump administration lawyers urged the justices to strike down a law passed by Congress. And they appeared to have the support of most of the conservatives.

The only doubt arose over the question of whether the case was flawed because no current candidate was challenging the limits.

"The parties are very much weakened," said Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh. "This court's decisions over the years have together reduced the power of political parties, as compared to outside groups, with negative effects on our constitutional democracy."

He was referring to rulings that upheld unlimited campaign spending by wealthy donors and so-called super PACs.

In the Citizens United case of 2010, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and four other conservatives struck down the longstanding limits on campaign spending, including by corporations and unions. They did so on the theory that such spending was "independent" of candidates and was protected as free speech under the 1st Amendment.

They said the limits on [See Justices, A7]

contributions to candidates were not affected. Those limits could be justified because the danger of corruption where money bought political favors. This triggered a new era of ever-larger political spending but most of it was separate from the candidates and the parties.