Justice delayed and institutional credibility: Lessons from Easter Sunday case

To analyse the justice delays and inconsistencies following the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, and to propose policy measures to strengthen the rule of law, enhance prosecutorial and judicial independence, and restore public trust in Sri Lanka’s criminal justice system.

- By Mahil Dole

Justice delayed has not only compounded victims' suffering but has also damaged institutional credibility

Background

The Easter Sunday terrorist attacks in April 2019 killed over 260 people and injured hundreds.

Despite extensive investigations, justice for victims remains delayed.

Inconsistencies in prosecutorial decisions by the Attorney General's Department, coupled with judicial delays, have raised questions about political interference, institutional weakness, and erosion of public trust.

This case has become a litmus test for the credibility of Sri Lanka’s criminal justice system.

Key issues

1. Rule of law under strain

Justice must be equal, timely, and free from political influence.

Prolonged delays have weakened the principle of equality before the law.

2. Law enforcement challenges

Investigations identified key suspects, but allegations of selective targeting and poor evidence management persist.

Justice delayed has not only compounded victims’ suffering but has also damaged institutional credibility

Coordination gaps between police and prosecution undermine case strength.

3. Attorney General's Department