Iran's Islamic Evolution

Both conservatives and reformists consider the ballot box an essential instrument

“There may be two candidates, but they are part of the system”

- Marc Champion and Ladane Nasseri

Maryam was 22 days old when Iranians dethroned their king in 1979. The Islamic regime that followed— with its black and brown robes, covered heads, and dour religiosity— was “just a fact” of life, she says. “We never thought about anything different, because we hadn’t seen anything else.” Thirty-eight years later, that acceptance is wearing thin.

The 19 May presidential vote—and the jubilant street celebrations that followed the reelection of President Hassan Rouhani, the nearest thing to a liberal allowed onto the ballot—showed an Iranian society much changed since the days of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s Islamic revolution and unwilling to turn back. “One of my teachers used to tell us that if any strand of your hair showed, you would be hung up by it,” says Maryam, who like others interviewed for this article declined to give her last name for fear of retribution. “Now you can drive around in a car with your boyfriend, and no one says anything.”

Khomeini’s successor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the coterie of clerics and unelected officials who hold most power in Iran see elections as a means to preserve and legitimise the Islamic revolution; many voters view them as a means to force the liberalisation of the regime. Although those propositions are at odds, the shared belief that the ballot box is an important instrument has been a source of stability in a region where several recent experiments in democracy have flamed out.