Magzter GOLD ile Sınırsız Olun

Magzter GOLD ile Sınırsız Olun

Sadece 9.000'den fazla dergi, gazete ve Premium hikayeye sınırsız erişim elde edin

$149.99
 
$74.99/Yıl

Denemek ALTIN - Özgür

Collective Action & Climate Change

Philosophy Now

|

October/November 2025

Nevin Chellappah says we can't dodge responsibility by our effects being small.

- By Nevin Chellappah

A common response climate activists face when they ask people to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions is: “My individual emissions make no difference to the harms done by climate change, so I have no moral reason to reduce my emissions.” This argument is problematic given the current threat climate change poses for our lives, for it could lead to apathy and defeatism about the climate crisis. It raises the problem of collective impact, which concerns how the aggregation of individually inconsequential actions can produce a morally bad outcome overall.

First, I shall formally set out the argument against us having a moral reason to reduce our individual emissions. Then, I'll argue against the argument's first premise, demonstrating that individual emissions have nonzero expected effects on a chaotic weather system. Thereafter, I'll respond to an objection by arguing that the effects of individual emissions have an average negative value. Next, I'll reframe the argument using small nonzero expected effects before arguing against the second premise, suggesting that individual emissions worsen the effects of climate change experienced by individuals. Subsequently, I'll respond to another objection by suggesting that not having a marginal effect does not absolve you of responsibility for the overall outcome. Finally, I shall conclude that the argument that we have no moral reason to reduce our individual emissions is unsound.

We Have No Moral Reason to Reduce Our Emissions

The argument that we have no moral reason to reduce our emissions can be formally presented as:

P1. Individual emissions have zero expected effects on climate change.
P2. Zero expected effects on climate change cause no harm.
C1. Individual emissions do not cause harm.
P3. To have a moral reason to cut our emissions, individual emissions need to cause harm.
C2. Therefore, we have no moral reason to cut individual emissions.

Philosophy Now'den DAHA FAZLA HİKAYE

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Bilbo Theorizes About Wellbeing

Eric Comerford overhears Bilbo and Gandalf discussing happiness.

time to read

9 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

What Women?

Marcia Yudkin remembers almost choking at Cornell

time to read

11 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Islamic Philosophers On Tyranny

Amir Ali Maleki looks at tyranny from an Islamic perspective.

time to read

4 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Peter Singer

The controversial Australian philosopher defends the right to choose to die on utilitarian grounds

time to read

5 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Another Conversation with Martin Heidegger?

Raymond Tallis talks about communication problems.

time to read

7 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Letters

When inspiration strikes, don't bottle it up. Email me at rick.lewis@philosophynow.org Keep them short and keep them coming!

time to read

17 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

The Philosophy of William Blake

Mark Vernon looks at the imaginative thinking of an imaginative artist.

time to read

9 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Philosophical Haiku

Peering through life’s lens God in nature is deduced: The joy of being.

time to read

1 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Shorts

More songs about Buildings and Food' was the title of a 1978 album by the rock band Talking Heads. It was about all the things rock stars normally don't sing about. Pop songs are usually about variations on the theme of love; tracks like Rose Royce's 1976 hit 'Car Wash' are the exception. Philosophers, likewise, tend to have a narrow focus on epistemology, metaphysics and trifles like the meaning of life. But occasionally great minds stray from their turf and write about other matters, for example buildings (Martin Heidegger), food (Hobbes), tomato juice (Robert Nozick), and the weather (Lucretius and Aristotle). This series of Shorts is about these unfamiliar themes; about the things philosophers also write about.

time to read

2 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Philosophy Now

Philosophy Now

Hedonic Treadmills in the Vale of Tears

Michael Gracey looks at how philosophers have pursued happiness.

time to read

8 mins

December 2025 / January 2026

Listen

Translate

Share

-
+

Change font size