試す 金 - 無料
Why Territorial Managers Stifle Innovation and What to Do About It
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Summer 2024
Managers who feel insecure about their status tend not to encourage novel ideas from their employees. Fostering their identification with the organization can change this behavior.

Dilip has been working hard on a game-changing idea for a new product. But when he excitedly approaches his boss to share it and get approval for further development and testing, his proposal is quickly rejected. Instead of offering constructive feedback on how to make the idea workable, his boss vaguely refers to a lack of budget and discourages Dilip from pursuing any further ideas.
Sound familiar? Sadly, such scenarios are all too common in many organizations.
Employee creativity and innovation are critical to the success of organizations today. However, when employees do generate novel ideas, they often fail to receive encouragement or see their ideas materialize. Managers are a significant contributor to this phenomenon; even when they profess to value creativity, they routinely reject innovative ideas proposed by employees, preventing their implementation. Why do managers say no to ideas that could benefit their companies and even themselves?
Researchers have so far focused on personality factors, managers’ economic mindsets, or managers’ general aversion to uncertainty as explanations for this stifling of employee ideas. For example, one study has suggested that because managers are always focused on the financial consequences of their decisions, they reject novel ideas whose financial outcomes cannot be reliably forecast. However, as we discuss in our paper in Organization Science, there are deeper reasons for such rejection, rooted in managers’ self-interests, underlying fears, and insecurities.
このストーリーは、MIT Sloan Management Review の Summer 2024 版からのものです。
Magzter GOLD を購読すると、厳選された何千ものプレミアム記事や、9,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスできます。
すでに購読者ですか? サインイン
MIT Sloan Management Review からのその他のストーリー

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Listen
Translate
Change font size