Historical accuracy in Indian cinema: A double-edged sword

Cinema has long been more than just a form of entertainment in India.

- DR. SHWETA SHARMA

It is an integral part of our culture, a medium through which stories are told, emotions are expressed, and societal narratives are shaped. With over 1,500 to 2,000 films produced annually in more than 20 languages, the Indian film industry stands as one of the largest in the world.

Among its many genres, historical films have carved a unique niche. They not only entertain but also attempt to inform, educate, and instill a sense of pride in our collective past. However, in doing so, they often walk a tightrope between historical accuracy and creative liberty.

In recent years, we have witnessed a notable surge in films centered around historical events and figures. Be it the valor of Maharana Pratap, the strategic brilliance of Chanakya, or the spiritual legacy of Swami Vivekananda, Indian cinema has sought inspiration from its rich and varied history. But with this surge comes a responsibility—one that filmmakers cannot afford to overlook.

THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD OF REPRESENTATION

Historical films are a powerful medium for shaping public perception. For many viewers, a movie might be their first or only exposure to a particular historical event or personality. This positions filmmakers as quasi-historians, with the power to influence how history is remembered and understood. Consequently, the question arises: should filmmakers prioritize factual integrity over cinematic flourish?

Some filmmakers do indeed invest in rigorous research, consulting historical texts, archival records, and even subject matter directed by Richard Attenborough, or The Legend of Bhagat Singh (2002) are often praised for their commitment to authenticity and nuanced portrayal of historical figures. These films become more than mere entertainment—they are visual documents of historical interpretation.