Fans upset with the ref and Saints' 'spoiling tactics'

Our panel reflect on Leeds' 6-0 defeat to St Helens

- 

A hot and sunny Friday evening set the stage for the doubleheader featuring both women's and men's teams against the Saints.

The heat in the stands was intense and I certainly wouldn't want to play in such conditions. The women's match looked like being a win for the Rhinos, but with just 45 seconds remaining, Saints scored and converted, clinching the game 22-20.

In the men's match, I had hoped for another victory for the Rhinos and anticipated a close contest, predicting they would win by eight points. It was nip and tuck throughout, but unfortunately not in favour of the Rhinos. In my view, our attack was rather slow and disorganised, although we performed well defensively.

There were numerous long passes to the wing that were missed, which could have changed the outcome. The referee made several questionable decisions and appeared to favour the Saints by overlooking many infractions. There were a few high tackles and I was particularly concerned about an injury to Mik Oledzki, which I hope is not as serious as it seems.

Next up is Salford Red Devils at home, which on paper should yield an easy two points. However, I expect Salford to come prepared and I hope for an exciting match.

What is it about St Helens? They seem to have the curse over us. The one thing that hit me after Friday's loss was, we must have patience and not get drawn in by spoiling tactics.

It was, to be honest, not a great game to watch. I have never seen a Saints team set out to spoil, mess about at the ruck, hold down and happily give away penalties as much as this one.