Opposition's Democratic Imperative

India's opposition must reinvent itself as a constructive force, prioritising accountability, debate, and citizens' interests over theatrics to strengthen Parliament as a true temple of democracy

- JOHN FELIX RAJ & PRABHAT KUMAR DATTA

The increasing disruptions in parliamentary proceedings in India have brought to the forefront the role of the opposition in Parliament. The opposition is a crucial component of a democratic setup, and its effectiveness is essential for ensuring accountability, transparency, and informed decision-making. In this article, we will explore the concept of opposition, its evolution, and its significance in the Indian parliamentary system. We will also examine the challenges faced by the opposition and the need for a renewed commitment to constructive debate.

Parliamentary discussions are the backbone of democratic decision-making. They provide a platform for elected representatives to engage in informed debates, raise concerns, and shape policy. However, the frequent disruptions in Parliament have resulted in significant losses, both financially and in terms of productivity. The 17th Lok Sabha, for instance, held only 274 sittings, averaging 55 days per year, the lowest in parliamentary history.

The institution of opposition is a modern concept that emerged in ancient Rome and Greece, where limited democracy prevailed. The Westminster tradition of parliamentary opposition began to take shape in the 17th century, with statutory recognition given to the leader of the opposition in 1937. In India, the opposition emerged during British rule, with small organisations like the British Indian Association and the Indian National Congress playing a crucial role in raising the voice of the people.