Denemek ALTIN - Özgür
Minimum Public Shareholding Norms In India, Is It Time For Change?
Legal Era
|September 2019
One of the Big-bang Proposals in the Union Budget Was for the Sebi to consider increasing minimum Public Shareholding Requirement in Listed Companies to 35 Per Cent.
-
On July 5, 2019, the Indian finance minister, in her debut budget speech, announced a few big-bang proposals. One such proposal was for capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), to consider increasing minimum public shareholding requirement in listed companies from the current threshold of 25% to 35%.

Jabarati Chandra
Partner, S&R Associates
The current threshold
Many Indian listed companies are promoter-owned and controlled (promoters are generally controlling shareholders in a company). For an initial public offering to be successful and for continuous listing, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, as amended (“SCRR”), includes the concept of a minimum public float (public is defined to exclude promoters and the promoter group).
The minimum public shareholding requirement has been subject to change from time to time. Prior to September 1993, companies seeking to list their shares were required to offer at least 60% of their capital to the public, whose threshold was subsequently reduced to 25% on September 20, 1993. In 2010, the regulation was further amended to harmonize initial and continuous listing requirements and, the current requirement of maintaining the minimum public float of 25% on a continuing basis after listing, was codified. Companies (other than public sector units (“
Bu hikaye Legal Era dergisinin September 2019 baskısından alınmıştır.
Binlerce özenle seçilmiş premium hikayeye ve 9.000'den fazla dergi ve gazeteye erişmek için Magzter GOLD'a abone olun.
Zaten abone misiniz? Oturum aç
Legal Era'den DAHA FAZLA HİKAYE
Legal Era
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
12 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
11 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
6 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
6 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
5 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
7 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
8 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
5 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
6 mins
December 2020
Legal Era
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE
7 mins
December 2020
Translate
Change font size
