Denemek ALTIN - Özgür

Minimum Public Shareholding Norms In India, Is It Time For Change?

Legal Era

|

September 2019

One of the Big-bang Proposals in the Union Budget Was for the Sebi to consider increasing minimum Public Shareholding Requirement in Listed Companies to 35 Per Cent.

Minimum Public Shareholding Norms In India, Is It Time For Change?

On July 5, 2019, the Indian finance minister, in her debut budget speech, announced a few big-bang proposals. One such proposal was for capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), to consider increasing minimum public shareholding requirement in listed companies from the current threshold of 25% to 35%.

Jabarati Chandra

Partner, S&R Associates

The current threshold

Many Indian listed companies are promoter-owned and controlled (promoters are generally controlling shareholders in a company). For an initial public offering to be successful and for continuous listing, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, as amended (“SCRR”), includes the concept of a minimum public float (public is defined to exclude promoters and the promoter group).

The minimum public shareholding requirement has been subject to change from time to time. Prior to September 1993, companies seeking to list their shares were required to offer at least 60% of their capital to the public, whose threshold was subsequently reduced to 25% on September 20, 1993. In 2010, the regulation was further amended to harmonize initial and continuous listing requirements and, the current requirement of maintaining the minimum public float of 25% on a continuing basis after listing, was codified. Companies (other than public sector units (“

Legal Era'den DAHA FAZLA HİKAYE

Legal Era

Legal Era

If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity

Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…

time to read

12 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS

time to read

11 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

NEW ARBITRATION RULES

PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)

time to read

6 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

M&A in the time of COVID and beyond

What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied

time to read

6 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD

Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required

time to read

5 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING

Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.

time to read

7 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA

A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?

time to read

8 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE

Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations

time to read

5 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC

WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?

time to read

6 mins

December 2020

Legal Era

Legal Era

A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE

A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE

time to read

7 mins

December 2020

Translate

Share

-
+

Change font size