SECTION 14(2) OF THE CODE PROHIBITS THE TERMINATION, SUSPENSION AND INTERRUPTION OF SUPPLY OF “ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES” TO THE OPERATIONS OF THE CORPORATE DEBTOR DURING THE ‘MORATORIUM’ PERIOD UNDER THE CODE
One of the key tenets of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) is preservation of the corporate debtor as a going concern until completion of the insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated against it. This is intended to preserve value of the assets of the corporate debtor and facilitate a successful resolution. In furtherance of this goal, Section 14(2) of the Code prohibits the termination, suspension and interruption of supply of “essential goods or services” to the operations of the corporate debtor during the ‘moratorium’ period under the Code, i.e. from the date of commencement of the insolvency resolution process until its conclusion.
Regulation 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations) classifies four supplies as “essential goods and services”, namely electricity, water, telecommunication services and information technology services. However, the supply of these items would not be considered “essential” if it is provided in large quantities as a direct input to the output produced or supplied by the corporate debtor1 or is used by the corporate debtor to make a profit.2 For instance, water supplied to a corporate debtor would be considered an essential supply for drinking and sanitation purposes, but not for generation of hydro-electricity.3
While this list suggests that the Code only prohibits disruption of these four supplies, in practice, insolvency tribunals have stepped beyond this list and expanded the meaning of “essential goods and services”. Illustratively, in Canara Bank v. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited4, the tribunal held printing ink, printing plates, printing blanket, solvents etc. as “essential” goods for operation of a corporate debtor engaged in the business of publishing newspapers. The order was upheld by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in appeal.5
Continue reading your story on the app
Continue reading your story in the magazine
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…
Supreme Court upholds NCLAT judgement, no relief for defaulting promoters
The Supreme Court ruled that defaulting promoters, who are barred from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), could not use any scheme or arrangement to gain control of their companies during the liquidation process.
उत्तम गैल्वा के लिए बोली लगाएगी आर्सेलर!
• उत्तम गैल्वा की कोल्ड रोलिंग क्षमता है 12 लाख टन सालाना • 31 मार्च को कंपनी ने 616 करोड़ रुपये मूलधन और 81.63 करोड़ रुपये ब्याज के भुगतान में चूक की • एसबीआई सीआईआरपी शुरू करने के लिए पहुंची एनसीएलटी
CYRUS MISTRY WALKS THE TALK
By giving up his claim to the Tata top job, Mistry gives primacy to governance over quest for power.
THE NCLAT DECISION TO REINSTATE CYRUS MISTRY AS TATA SONS EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN HAS TURNED THE TABLES ON THE TATA GROUP. WHAT NEXT?
Tata Vs Mistry - New Battleline
The Tata vs Mistry saga takes a new turn with the NCLAT reinstating Cyrus as Tata Sons chairman.
Tata Sons Will Pursue Legal Recourse: Chandrasekaran
Stay focussed, says Chairman in mail to employees
DECODING THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE: RECENT AMENDMENTS 2019
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
Sterling Biotech Promoters Gets A Breather As NCLAT Halts Liquidation Process.
In a landmark ruling, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has set aside National Company Law Tribunal NCLT order to liquidate Sterling Biotech.
JSW Steel Moves NCLAT Fr Immunity From Criminal Cases Against Bhushan Power And Steel
Seeks approval to retain profit made by the insolvent firm in last two years
MSMEs Need Not Use Ibc To Recover Dues
Taking the route the MSMED Act provides is faster, easier and can be enforced through decree.