Cracking The Whip On Shell Companies A Move That Was The Need Of The Hour
Legal Era|August 2019

Sufficient checks and balances have been introduced in the current legislative regime to curb the menace of shell companies but whether their implementation will be as ambitious, only time will tell

Cracking The Whip On Shell Companies A Move That Was The Need Of The Hour

The Companies Act, 2013 (2013 Act) does not define ‘shell’ companies, however, as commonly understood, shell companies are those companies that are formally registered with the relevant authority, but which do not carry out any business activity or do not commence any business operations. This common understanding regarding shell companies is synonymous to the definition of shell companies given by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (in the OECD Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment).

In the recent past, the regulator has been active in cracking down on shell companies, which have been causing menace to the economy by being the vehicle for money-laundering and other financial wrongdoings. First, the regulator struck down lakhs of shell companies across India and disqualified lakhs of directors of such shell companies, and thereafter, it came up with certain progressive amendments (discussed below) to the 2013 Act to keep a check on such companies.

Legislative Background

Section 248 of the 2013 Act, which was enforced with effect from 26 December 2016, empowers the relevant Registrar of Companies (RoC) to strike off from the register of companies (Register), the names of such companies which (the RoC has reasonable cause to believe to) have inter alia failed to commence their business within one year of their incorporation or which are not carrying on any business or operation within a period of two immediately preceding financial years and have not made applications for obtaining the status of a dormant company under the 2013 Act. Further, Section 248 also empowers a company (having the consent of at least seventy five per cent of its members) which has defaulted in respect of the aforesaid provisions to (upon extinguishing all its liabilities) make an application to the RoC to remove the name of such company from the Register.

This story is from the August 2019 edition of Legal Era.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the August 2019 edition of Legal Era.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.

MORE STORIES FROM LEGAL ERAView All
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Legal Era

If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity

Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…

time-read
10+ mins  |
December 2020
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
Legal Era

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS

time-read
10+ mins  |
December 2020
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
Legal Era

NEW ARBITRATION RULES

PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
Legal Era

M&A in the time of COVID and beyond

What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Legal Era

SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD

Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required

time-read
5 mins  |
December 2020
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Legal Era

JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING

Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.

time-read
7 mins  |
December 2020
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
Legal Era

Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA

A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?

time-read
8 mins  |
December 2020
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Legal Era

CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE

Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations

time-read
5 mins  |
December 2020
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
Legal Era

ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC

WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
Legal Era

A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE

A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE

time-read
7 mins  |
December 2020