Labour's asylum plans are cruel, clumsy and unachievable

If the home secretary's twin aims in making her immigration reform announcements this week were to receive a ringing endorsement from the far right and to make migrants quake in their boots, she has succeeded - possibly even exceeded - her own expectations.

- Diane Taylor

The endorsement came last Saturday, courtesy of Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. In response to a post on X which predicted that Shabana Mahmood would announce that refugees will be granted only a temporary stay in the UK and deported if their home countries are later deemed safe, he posted: "Well done patriots." Meanwhile, asylum seekers and refugees I have spoken to are panicked at the prospect of having to be uprooted once again after feeling safe in the UK, often after experiencing years of risk and danger.

Since last Thursday, journalists have been receiving an average of one Home Office press release every few hours, each one focusing on a different aspect of what Mahmood has described as "the most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times".

But a quick investigation below the surface of the eyecatching we-mean-business sloganising reveals a mix of recycling, hype and unachievable promises. According to the home secretary, support will end for those who "game the system", while the days of a "soft-touch asylum system are over" because she is going to tear up refugees' "golden ticket" to the UK. There is mounting disquiet about all this among Labour voters and MPs.