Collective for Social Media Declaration has its say on Protection of the State from Terrorism Act

Warns serious risks to freedom of expression, privacy, and democratic accountability

- By THE COLLECTIVE FOR SOCIAL Meo1a DECLARATION

THE Protection of the State from Terrorism Act, No. of 2026 (PSTA) presents itself as a human rights improvement on the existing Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

This framing obscures the reality that its core architecture, including administrative detention, military powers, proscription regimes, and broad speech offences, replicates the essential features that made the PTA objectionable for over four decades.

The Bill replicates the fundamental architecture that made the PTA objectionable. Rather than using the ordinary criminal law regime for terrorism offences alongside emergency powers when genuinely required, the PSTA creates parallel criminal jurisdictions with reduced safeguards and expanded executive authority. Its scheme maintains extraordinary arrest and detention powers, grants the Attorney General potentially coercive mechanisms to compel admissions without trial, and empowers the President, senior police officers, and the Defence Secretary to issue prescription orders, restriction orders, curfews, and prohibited place declarations with limited judicial oversight. As the title suggests, the Bill's fundamental purpose is to protect the state rather than to protect civilians from violence, a framing that offers little resistance to treating public dissent, political disruption, and threats to political power as terrorism in themselves. Though the Bill includes carve-outs for protest and industrial action, these sit in tension with other provisions and may prove ineffective in practice.