Poging GOUD - Vrij
PROPOSITION: IT'S TIME FOR A NATIONAL DIVORCE
Reason magazine
|May 2023
AFFIRMATIVE: A National Divorce Is an Opportunity for Peaceful Coexistence
THE LAST THREE years have shown that the country cannot live together in peace.
The largest, most obvious divorce-worthy incidents in this country were the COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates. Those of us who opposed these measures were dehumanized and effectively shut out of society. The proverbial line was finally drawn in the sand, but setting those grievances aside, we are still too culturally far apart to peacefully coexist. Our country has become an ideological war zone, with battles being fought over Black Lives Matter, abortion, school curriculums, and child gender reassignments. Everything has been politicized, from entertainment to diet to the FBI. While a large group of libertarians refuse to fit perfectly into the left or right paradigm, there are two culturally and politically dominant factions in this country, and they are not living peacefully together.
We are in an abusive relationship. I want a divorce.
Instead of letting one party twist in the wind as their rights are further eroded until nothing is left, we should call it quits before worse rights violations and violence erupts. One of the most infuriating experiences over the last three years has been watching emotional reactions supersede basic constitutional rights and civil liberties.
Much like a traditional divorce, a national divorce is an emotional topic. People long for the good ol' days, remembering when things weren't so bad. But those days are gone and we just don't get along anymore.
Dit verhaal komt uit de May 2023-editie van Reason magazine.
Abonneer u op Magzter GOLD voor toegang tot duizenden zorgvuldig samengestelde premiumverhalen en meer dan 9000 tijdschriften en kranten.
Bent u al abonnee? Aanmelden
MEER VERHALEN VAN Reason magazine
Reason magazine
AI vs. Paperwork
AT SEPTEMBER'S NATIONAL Conservatism Conference, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) argued Al “threatens the common man's liberty” and that “only humans should advise on critical medical treatments.” Yet Al promises to enhance the human experience by reducing the price of critical services like health care.
1 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
Q&A Katie Engelhart
THE CANADIAN PULITZER Prize-winning journalist Katie Engelhart wrote the new book The Inevitable: Dispatches on the Right to Die.
3 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
What Happened After Greta Rideout's Husband Raped Her
WOMAN SHOWS up at the police station and says she would like to press charges for rape.
6 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
An Alarmingly Broad View of 'Public Health'
DEFENDING COVID-19 POLICIES against legal challenges, government officials relied heavily on Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a 1905 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a smallpox vaccine mandate imposed by the Cambridge Board of Health.
3 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
'He Never Got To Go 'Home'
INSIDE TEXAS' SECRETIVE \"CIVIL COMMITMENT\" SYSTEM
25 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
Inside Vernor Vinge's FBI File
VERNOR VINGE-THE Hugo Award-winning science fiction author who passed away in March 2024—imagined a world where individuals, not governments, held the power.
1 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
Will Tariffs Steal Christmas?
SANTA CLAUS MIGHT be able to evade customs checkpoints as he magically smuggles toys into the country for the good boys and girls-but everyone else doing Christmas shopping this year could run into some problems.
2 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
THEY THOUGHT LEGAL WEED MEANT FREEDOM. THEN THE DRONES CAME.
A CALIFORNIA COUNTY TRIED TO USE DRONES TO FIND ILLEGAL MARIJUANA OPERATIONS, BUT IT PUNISHED BUILDING CODE VIOLATIONS INSTEAD.
18 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
Thank This Klansman for Your Freedom of Speech
A TWO-BIT BIGOT'S SUPREME COURT VICTORY REVERBERATES IN CONTEMPORARY DEBATES.
20 mins
December 2025
Reason magazine
The Art of the Presidential Health Cover-Up
WHEN THE St. Petersburg Times first launched PolitiFact in 2007, its purpose was to assess the veracity of statements made by “members of Congress, the president, cabinet secretaries, lobbyists, people who testify before Congress and anyone else who speaks up in Washington.”
3 mins
December 2025
Translate
Change font size
