Advocating for gender equality must not be seen as contentious

The recent remarks by PAP Women's Wing chair Sim Ann reflect views that reinforce gender stereotypes (Singapore forges own path to women's development, says PAP Women's Wing chair Sim Ann, March 9).

- 

The recent remarks by PAP Women's Wing chair Sim Ann reflect views that reinforce gender stereotypes (Singapore forges own path to women's development, says PAP Women's Wing chair Sim Ann, March 9). Take for example her view that "by allowing eligible young couples to apply for Housing Board flats, women learn to run their own households from young". Her comments reflect outdated gender norms that reinforce caregiving and household responsibilities as the woman's burden.

We are also troubled by her description of feminism as divisive and adversarial. Why is feminism - an idea rooted in equality - seen as divisive? Feminism does not seek to advance women at the expense of men. It calls for fairness, shared responsibilities, and equal opportunities for all genders. If we are advocating for equality, why is that seen as contentious?