Has the Meitei community been let down by those who speak for them?

The Meitei tribal community likely admires individuals who consistently represent them in various media spaces.

- YENGKHOM RONALD

While I may not know the specific individuals being referred to, they should be able to represent Meiteis on issues honestly and fearlessly, especially in sensitive or controversial contexts. Media speakers should be the ones who can clearly and persuasively communicate complex cultural, historical or political narratives. Speakers, who prioritise the welfare and unity of the Meitei people above personal or political agendas. Advocates who uplift and celebrate Meitei culture, language and traditions while addressing contemporary challenges. Those with a strong understanding of the issues at hand and the ability to present factual, well-researched arguments.

The Meitei public might admire speakers who consistently appear in the media due to their visibility. The Meitei media speakers and their followers are failing to bring meaningful changes or contribute to the progress of the community. When media speakers and their followers seem unwilling to accept their shortcomings, especially if their long-standing presence in public discourse has not led to tangible benefits for the society they claim to represent. If their speeches are repetitive and lack actionable content, and if the public continues to follow them without critical evaluation, it raises valid concerns about the direction of discourse and leadership in Meitei society. Followers who blindly support these speakers without questioning their relevance or substance can perpetuate ineffectiveness. This cycle of perpetuating ineffective narratives hinders progress for the Meitei community. If they truly care for the community, they should be open to stepping aside if their leadership has not been fruitful. Repeating the same narratives and refusing to adapt or challenge outdated ideas indeed hinders progress.