Keeping History core: A case against new education reforms

When Prime Minister, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, began speaking about new education reforms, earlier this year, many people had high hopes.

- BY DR. NALAKA SAMARAWEERA UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA

Despite the government’s decision to continue the same economic policies followed by Ranil Wickremesinghe’s government, there was a strong belief that, at least in the field of education, things would be different. As a political party that did not spare even a single Pirivena in making its presence felt, and one that has long advocated for a fair and equitable education system, expectations were understandably high. As individuals and groups as key stakeholders of education, they were searching for any formal document outlining the reforms that the PM had been planning to implement, starting in 2026. However, it was not possible for them, indicating a striking difference that sets the new reforms apart from the earlier reforms. That is the absence of such a formal document to make the public aware of the new reforms. Even the most controversial 1981 White Paper on Education, and the 2023 National Education Policy Framework, had formal documents that invited people to discuss, criticise, or endorse.

A couple of weeks back, however, the situation began to change as public outcry emerged over claims that the new reforms advocate for the sideline of History from the school curriculum. The PM quickly responded to the allegation, stating that History would remain compulsory up to Grade 11, even under the new reforms. Media reports indicated that awareness sessions were conducted for several parties regarding the proposed reforms.

Interestingly, a PowerPoint presentation (PPP) outlining the reforms has been circulating within limited circles. Since it lacks essential details and formality, several parties have called for a formal policy document. However, the government appears to consider the slides sufficient and even seems to take pride in them.