A bold attempt to convince sceptics that neuroscience has proved Freud was right

Vladimir Nabokov notoriously dismissed the "vulgar, shabby, and fundamentally medieval world" of the ideas of Sigmund Freud, whom he called.

- Raymond Tallis

Viennese witch doctor". His negative judgment has been shared by many in the near 90 years since Freud's death. A reputational high-water mark in the postwar period was followed by a collapse, at least in scientific circles, but there are signs of newfound respectability for his ideas, including among those who once rejected him outright. Mark Solms's latest book, a wide-ranging and engrossing defence of Freud as a scientist and a healer, is a striking contribution to the re-evaluation of a thinker whom WH Auden described as "no more a person now but a whole climate of opinion".

It would be difficult to improve on Solms's credentials for the task he sets himself. He is a neuroscientist, expert in the neuropsychology of dreams, the author of several books on the relationship between brain and consciousness, a practising psychoanalyst and the editor of the 24-volume revised standard edition of Freud's complete works. He is also a witty and lucid writer.

I read The Only Cure through the lens of its bold - perhaps too bold title. It contains two claims. First, that psychoanalysis is a cure in the sense that its benefits are lasting. Second, it is the only cure since rival treatments - notably drugs - may lose their effect when they are discontinued because they do not address underlying causes.