Prøve GULL - Gratis
Moral Decision-Making for a Job Search
Philosophy Now
|October/November 2025
Norman Schultz wonders when working is wrong.
-
Back in 2018 I found myself in an interesting spot. I had decided to leave academia and education to pursue something new in my working life. Despite the downsides, it's easy to feel morally comfortable with being a teacher, but many other jobs can give pause. The timing and my background placed me in a near perfect position to think about how ethics factors into choosing a career. So on what criteria does one base the moral legitimacy of a job? I realized that:
1. Many people take jobs they aren’t morally comfortable doing.
2. There probably are some truly immoral jobs — by which I mean, perfectly legal jobs no one should take.
3. People use a common set of reasons to justify morally questionable employment.
I suspect most people don’t look at the job market this way, probably due to personal preference — “I don’t judge others, but I wouldn’t feel right doing that for a living.” But in the interconnected world, one’s work can affect an enormous number of people. So if a job is immoral, performing that job could do quite a lot of harm. I want us to explore these matters here.
What Do I Mean by ‘Job’?
One might think that the subject simply reduces to a more general consideration of moral theory, in that I’m really asking on what criteria we correctly judge right and wrong at all. But there are relevant particulars to employment that weigh in on making a moral evaluation there. The fact that most people must work and each worker is often just one player in a large industry complicates matters. But first and foremost, I must clarify what counts as ‘employment’.
Denne historien er fra October/November 2025-utgaven av Philosophy Now.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA Philosophy Now
Philosophy Now
Books
Lucy Weir takes a wheel of healing for an intellectual spin, Frederik Kaufman examines a theory of the origins of equality, and Frank S. Robinson doubts a holistic vision of life, the universe, and everything.
14 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Moral Decision-Making for a Job Search
Norman Schultz wonders when working is wrong.
14 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
The Mediation of Touch
A conversation between Emma Jones and Luce Irigaray.
15 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Edward Gibbon (1737-1794)
John P. Irish considers some principles of history through the history of a historian.
11 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Karl Sigmund
is an emeritus professor of mathematics at the University of Vienna. He has made major contributions to evolutionary game theory and to the history of the Vienna Circle, who met regularly in Vienna from 1924-1936. Katharine Mullen talks with him about mathematics, and about the Vienna Circle.
5 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Can Al Teach Our Grandmothers To Suck Eggs?
Louis Tempany wonders whether the problem is with the machines or with us.
7 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Revisiting the Ontological Argument
Raymond Tallis contends that a definition of God cannot necessitate God's existence.
7 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
What My Sister Taught Me About Humanity
Lee Clarke argues that we need a more inclusive view of moral personhood.
13 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Macmurray on Relationship
Jeanne Warren presents aspects of John Macmurray's philosophy of the personal.
4 mins
October/November 2025
Philosophy Now
Forced Vaccination
Naina Krishnamurthy asks if it's ethical or egregious.
8 mins
October/November 2025
Listen
Translate
Change font size
