Prøve GULL - Gratis
How Neuroinclusion Builds Organizational Capabilities
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Summer 2025
Changing processes to be more inclusive of neurodiversity can improve hiring, innovation, and culture.

COMPANIES HAVE MADE GREAT STRIDES IN neuroinclusion since 2013, when SAP announced its Autism at Work program. The first major corporate initiative of its kind, it was soon followed by programs at Microsoft and EY.¹ As the respective founders of these programs, Jose, Neil, and Hiren have seen firsthand that their companies have benefited greatly from neuroinclusion, and from much more than just filling jobs. The broader ways that their neuroinclusion initiatives are changing their organizations are much more important than the direct benefits from the individual contributions of program participants (though those are also real). This is especially true as they incorporate what they have learned from neurodiversity employment (NDE) into mainstream business practices to build organizational capabilities.
The concept of neurodiversity is simple: There is naturally occurring variation in human brains, which results in differences in the way people think. Almost 1 in 5 people in the world is neurodistinct, meaning they live with differences like autism, dyslexia, attention deficits, or other “neuro” conditions. Though we've historically labeled them “disorders,” which implies a problem, people who have them possess skills and talents, some scarce, that organizations need. People who think differently don’t need fixing; they often thrive because of these neurological differences, not in spite of them. And their organizations can harness the many benefits (some unexpected) of different ways of thinking.
Denne historien er fra Summer 2025-utgaven av MIT Sloan Management Review.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Listen
Translate
Change font size