Prøve GULL - Gratis
CYBERATTACKS - The Ransomware Dilemma
MIT Sloan Management Review
|Summer 2022
The decision on whether to pay up when cybercriminals hold data hostage is shaped by choices leaders made long before an attack.

The ransomware business is booming: In the United States alone, this form of cyberattack increased in frequency by 200% between 2019 and 2021. It’s an urgent threat, but too many leaders are caught flat-footed when it happens to them. Ransomware is malicious software that uses encryption to prevent access to data on the infected machine, effectively paralyzing the computer system. The culprits behind the attack then demand payment in exchange for decrypting the files and restoring access to the infected systems. The tactic dates to the 1980s, but it became a prominent threat to businesses after 2010 with the rise of cryptocurrency, criminals’ preferred mode of payment.
It’s a threat riddled with uncertainties, which makes planning a response difficult. Many organizations just want to find the quickest way out, and that often means paying the ransom, even though the financial burden may be considerable and the outcome far from certain. In a recent study of 300 companies, 64% revealed that they had experienced a ransomware attack within the previous 12 months, and a staggering 83% of those paid the ransom. On average, only 8% of organizations that paid up recovered all of their data, while 63% got about half of it back.
Some organizations receive a demand for a second (and perhaps even higher) ransom, despite having paid the first one on time, but the worst-case scenario is when the victim pays but either never receives the decryption key or it doesn’t work as intended.1
Organizations that decide not to pay also bear costs in terms of business downtime and lost revenues. And organizations that are caught unprepared, without a reliable backup system or an incident response plan, end up suffering the most — not only financially but also reputationally.
Denne historien er fra Summer 2022-utgaven av MIT Sloan Management Review.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA MIT Sloan Management Review

MIT Sloan Management Review
Formalize Escalation Procedures to Improve Decision-Making
Conflict is inevitable. A systematic approach to escalation helps organizations manage disagreements efficiently and make better decisions.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A New Method for Assessing Circular Business Cases
Conventional business analysis overlooks the costs and new revenue sources found in circular approaches.
11 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Building Innovation Teams Across National Borders
Restrictive immigration policies are forcing multinational enterprises to rethink their R&D strategies. Here are four approaches to maintain innovation excellence with geographically dispersed teams.
14 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Strategic Alignment Reconciles Purpose and Profitability
Sustained performance requires a company purpose that is validated in the market.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The Hidden Costs of Coding With Generative Al
Generative Al can boost coding productivity, but careless deployment creates technical debt that cripples scalability and destabilizes systems.
6 mins
Fall 2025
MIT Sloan Management Review
Aligning Strategy and Skills
\"DO WE HAVE THE PEOPLE WE need to successfully execute our strategic plan?” That’s a perennial middle-of-the-night worry for business leaders.
1 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
Should You Recruit New People, or Upskill Your Workforce?
I worry that we don't have the skills in-house that we need to seize future opportunities.
2 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
The High Cost of Executives' Intellectual Property Blind Spots
Strategic business decisions often involve intellectual property, but senior managers' understanding of salient issues is often limited.
10 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
How the EU's Taxonomy Combats Greenwashing
The European Union's criteria for identifying green activities can be a better guide than standard ESG measures.
7 mins
Fall 2025

MIT Sloan Management Review
A Data-Driven Approach to Advancing Meritocracy
Instead of simply relying on best practices, employers should adopt a talent management strategy that addresses bias and inequity while ensuring efficient, fair, and merit-based decisions.
16 mins
Fall 2025
Translate
Change font size