Language as a tool, not a measure of intelligence

Language shows expression, not intelligence. English fluency isn't intellect. Embrace native languages for true equality and confidence.

- KHUSHBU JAIN

It is important to recognize that language, at its core, is a tool for communication. Mastery of any language, including English, enables individuals to express ideas, share knowledge, and connect with others. However, the ability to communicate in English, or any other specific language, should never be conflated with intelligence.

Intelligence is a multifaceted quality, encompassing analytical thinking, creativity, emotional understanding, and problem-solving abilities. These attributes are not determined by linguistic proficiency but by one's capacity to learn, adapt, and innovate.

In the Indian context, it is vital to dispel the misconception that English fluency is synonymous with intellect or competence. Not knowing English does not diminish a person's intelligence, potential, or worth. Rather, it simply reflects the linguistic environment and opportunities to which an individual has been exposed.

THE IMPACT OF INDIA'S OBSESSION WITH ENGLISH

India's colonial past has fostered an enduring and often unhealthy obsession with English. This has several tangible and intangible impacts:

a. Social Stratification: English proficiency is often seen as a marker of social status, creating divides between urban and rural populations, and between those with access to English-medium education and those without.

b. Erosion of Confidence: Many brilliant minds, especially from non-metropolitan backgrounds, are made to feel inferior due to their limited English skills, regardless of their actual intellect or capabilities.

c. Marginalization of Native Languages: The focus on English has led to the neglect of Indian languages, risking the loss of rich literary, cultural and philosophical traditions.

d.