SUPREME COURT: SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW NOT REQUIRED TO BE FORMULATED IN SECOND APPEALS ARISING OUT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA COURT

The Supreme Court in the case Gurbachan Singh (D) vs Gurcharan Singh(D) observed wherein second appeal is arising out of the State of Punjab And Haryana courts are required to frame substantial questions of law as stated under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

- 

The bench comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol in the case observed and has stated that the restraint in interfering with questions of fact under the jurisdiction of second appeal is not an absolute rule.

In the present case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the second appeal and has set aside the concurrent findings of the courts below it.

The Apex Court in the case observed and has noted that the said case arises out of a dispute in Punjab.