Sri Lanka’s stance on war in Gaza and questions it raises

THE Sri Lankan Foreign Ministry recently issued a media release regarding Israel’s war on Gaza—an announcement that comes after noticeable hesitation.

- A.L.A. Azeez

This statement follows sharp criticism in Parliament over the Government’s prolonged silence on Israel’s renewed military action and the resulting humanitarian crisis.

The most pressing question is why the Foreign Ministry’s statement fails to acknowledge the atrocities committed by Israel or express sympathy for the Palestinian people, who continue to suffer under an illegal and oppressive occupation. There is a perfunctory mention of “situation in Gaza” and an equally insipid call on ‘all sides’ to avoid precipitating actions. Notably, the statement omits any reference to a two-state solution—an absence that conveniently aligns with the position of the Netanyahu administration.

This seemingly skewed, unempathetic message inevitably raises profound concerns about the underlying motivations that compelled the Government to adopt such a posture. What is driving this diplomatic ambiguity?

Economic pressures and strategic calculations

One plausible explanation lies in Sri Lanka’s current economic interests—particularly, ongoing efforts to secure tariff concessions from the United States. With the return of Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies, there is an increasing risk that Sri Lankan exports could face significant barriers in the US market. While some economists suggest that these policies may boost Sri Lankan exports, the more immediate reality is one of negotiation and compromise. What better compromise could the US then demand in return for tariff concessions under President Trump?