A shadow of hope?

Ukraine and Russia wait warily for Trump's vision of peace

- Shaun Walker

Nobody knows when the talks will happen, or in what city. It is unclear who might be sitting at the table, or what format the discussion will take. But Donald Trump last weekend called for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine a day after meeting the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in Paris and at some point the incoming US administration will fully turn its attention to negotiating an end to Russia's war in Ukraine.

Last week, Trump appointed the retired army general Keith Kellogg as his special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, tasked primarily with ending the war. Or as Trump put it in his online announcement, to "secure PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH".

As the US transition approaches, both Moscow and Kyiv are warily considering the prospect of talks, downplaying the idea publicly yet manoeuvring to be in the best possible position when Trump takes office in January. Ukraine, after finally receiving a long-requested green light, has begun firing western-supplied long-range missiles into Russia;

Vladimir Putin, in response, used a nuclear-capable ballistic missile to hit the city of Dnipro last month, and followed it up with escalatory threats.

An easy path to a peace deal is hard to discern. A common assumption in the west has been that freezing the line of conflict could be a prelude to talks, but neither side appears keen: Russia, because it is advancing on the battlefield; Ukraine, because it fears that without real security guarantees from the west freezing the lines would simply give Russia time to regroup before it launched a fresh assault.

"It would mean losing the war," said Mykhailo Podolyak, an aide to Zelenskyy. "Russia gets our territory, and then they will dominate at the negotiation table, with new demands ... I don't really understand what these talks would be. Would it just be that we are told to fulfil Russia's ultimatums? How would that be in Ukraine's interest, after three years of resistance?"