Globalism, Freedom & Democracy Do Not Mix

The world today is packed with wealthy institutions and individuals that stand in revolt against the ideas of freedom and democracy. They do not like the idea of geographically constrained states with zones of juridical power.

- 

They believe they have a global mission and want to empower global institutions against the sovereignty of people living in nation states.In practice, the only means by which average people can restrain tyranny and despotism is through voting at the national level. None of us have any influence over the policies of the WHO, World Bank, IMF, much less over the Gates or Soros Foundations. Jeffrey A. Tucker describes this tyranny.

Many of the most prosperous Western nations in the world today are facing the migrant crisis. They are flooded with migrants who are overwhelming the system, infuriating the citizenry, adding fiscal burdens, disrupting public order, and leading to possible political instability.

Interesting question: Why after many multiple decades of only localized migrant issues, most having to do with border wars or other disruptions, have so many nations at once dealt with floods of people exploiting broken migration systems? In other words, how did a local problem become a global problem so quickly? How did all border systems break at once? And consider the problem before this one. We had a globalized response to the COVID crisis. In most nations of the world, the policy response was eerily similar. There was masking, distancing, closures, travel restrictions, and capacity limits, while big business was allowed to stay open. The same methods, which have no modem precedent, were attempted in all countries in the world except a few. The states that did not go along-Sweden, Tanzania, Nicaragua among others-face unrelenting attacks from world media.