Gender inequality in inheritance: A call for change

The disparities in treatment between sons and daughters are stark and, in many cases, heartbreaking. In numerous families, sons are encouraged to lead extravagant lifestyles, while daughters grapple with financial limitations. The societal expectation that sons will care for their parents in old age contrasts sharply with the assumption that daughters will establish their own families.

- CAPT INDIRA VASHISHTA

Gender inequality is not merely an abstract concept; it is a pervasive reality that permeates the very fabric of our lives. One glaring manifestation of this inequality lies in inheritance practices, where centuries-old traditions and biases often sideline daughters.

Despite laws advocating fairness, the entrenched mindset that prioritizes male heirs perpetuates a cycle of disparity, making true equality a challenging goal. Fortunately, the Indian government has recognized this issue and has made strides to address it through various bills and amendments aimed at minimizing the gender gap.

The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005 marked a crucial step forward. This landmark legislation granted daughters equal rights to their father's property, whether ancestral or self-acquired, acknowledging their rightful place as heirs. However, the reality on the ground often tells a different story. Societal beliefs that prioritize male heirs frequently undermine the implementation of this law.

For instance, if a father chooses to draft a will that bequeaths his property solely to his sons, the daughter may find herself stripped of her rightful claim, regardless of her contributions or worth.