‘Human side of judging inevitable and essential’

Justice Surya Kant, who is set to take charge as the country's 53rd Chief Justice on November 24, speaks to Utkarsh Anand in an interview where he reflected on the human dimension of judging, the patience he learned as a farmer's son, and the institutional discipline he believes must anchor the judiciary. Edited excerpts:

- 

JUSTICE SURYA KANT, CJI-DESIGNATE

What made you decide to study law? Was it a natural choice or a leap of faith?

Choosing to study law was a decision shaped by a blend of passion, curiosity, and a desire to create impact. From an early age, I was drawn to debates and enjoyed dissecting social issues, which naturally inclined me towards the study of law. I felt like it was not just an academic pursuit, but an extension of my personal strengths and interests. Of course, it was also a leap of faith. Law is a demanding field that requires years of commitment, adaptability, and resilience. Choosing law meant accepting the responsibility of shaping my own path in a discipline that is as challenging as it is rewarding.

Over 21 years into judgeship, how do you deal with the human side of judging — when the law may demand one thing, but conscience tugs another way?

After 21 years on the bench, I have come to understand that the human side of judging is both inevitable and essential. The law provides the framework, precedent, and structure that ensure fairness across cases, but every decision also involves human stories, emotions, and struggles. When conscience tugs in one direction and the law points in another, my approach is to first acknowledge that tension rather than suppress it. I begin by grounding myself in the law, and simultaneously look for lawful ways to honour the human realities in front of me — whether through careful selection of remedies, or using discretion where the law allows it. Ultimately, I accept that my duty is to apply the law as faithfully as possible, but I strive to do so with compassion, clarity, and respect for the people whose lives are affected. It is a balance: the law keeps me steady, and my conscience ensures that I never forget the humanity behind the cases I decide.