THE HAZY SAMPLE: A LAB ERROR THAT SHOOK A LUBE OIL BLENDING PLANT

Narrative of the Incident - One small dash in an additive code was all it took to derail a carefully planned test.

- 

In the laboratory of a Lube Oil Blending Plant (LOBP)—renowned for its disciplined processes and methodical testing protocols—a new formulation for an advanced engine oil blend had just arrived from international collaborators. Before pilot production, the formulation needed to be validated through a lab-scale blend, checking appearance, viscosity, and stability.

The recipe clearly called for a proprietary dispersant inhibitor package labeled “F 2183.” An experienced chemist was assigned the task and, following routine procedure, prepared the trial blend. But within an hour, the sample began to show an unusual haze. The formulation had already been vetted and approved abroad, so the instability was unexpected.

An audit of batch records and lab logbooks uncovered the problem: instead of “F 2183,” the chemist had mistakenly used “F 218-3”—an anti-wear additive intended for a completely different set of formulations. The nearly identical labels, stored side by side in inventory, had led to a critical misread.

Error Analysis:

This case, while seemingly minor due to the lack of downstream production, served as a critical reminder of how subtle lapses can cascade into larger issues. The following factors contributed to the incident:

1. Similar Naming Convention:

• Both additives bore almost identical nomenclature: “F 2183” and “F 218-3.”

• The visual similarity led to cognitive oversight, especially in a fast-paced lab environment.

2. Labelling & Inventory Arrangement: