Religious extremism set to gain from rising Israel-Iran hostilities

Many of the international pronouncements on the current dangerously escalating Israel-Iran hostilities could be seen as lacking in adequate balance and comprehensiveness.

- BY LYNN OCKERSZ

The majority of these reactions could be said to be failing in addressing the aspects of the conflict that matter most.

For example, there is the recent UN General Assembly resolution on the crisis which calls for an 'immediate, unconditional and lasting ceasefire in the Gaza' and which goes on to urge 'Member States to take necessary steps to ensure Israel complies with its international legal obligations.' An immediate and durable ceasefire is indeed the number one requirement in the Middle East today but could it be 'unconditional'? Could it ignore the principal requirement of Israel's security? These posers need to be addressed as well.

Besides, it is not only Israel that should be compelled to meet its 'international legal obligations.' All the states and actors that feature in the conflict need to be alerted to their 'international legal obligations'. While it goes without saying that Israel must meet its international legal obligations fully, the same goes for Iran and all other Middle Eastern countries that enjoy UN membership and who are currently at odds with Israel. For instance, Israel is a UN member state that enjoys equal sovereignty with other states within the UN fold. No such state could seek to 'bomb Israel out of existence' for example.