The M Factor

Opinion

- RAKESH K CHITKARA

President Donald Trump recently introduced sweeping tariffs on imported goods, establishing a baseline 10% tariff on most items, with significantly higher tariffs on imports from countries experiencing substantial trade imbalances, such as China, the European Union, Mexico, India, and Japan.

While Trump and his administration argue that these tariffs will restore American manufacturing and reduce trade deficits, the reality is far more complex.

By imposing these tariffs, Trump may inadvertently be taxing American consumers while pushing global trade to rebalance in a manner that ultimately disadvantages the United States.

The immediate impact of the new tariffs will be felt by American consumers, who will see higher prices on everyday goods.

For example, fresh produce from Mexico, a key import, could rise in cost by 20% or more, making groceries more expensive for families across the country.

Similarly, electronics imported from China, including smartphones and laptops, are expected to see price hikes due to tariffs ranging from 20% to over 40%.

This added financial burden comes at a time when inflation is already squeezing American household budgets.

Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman has criticized the strategy, emphasizing that tariffs function as a consumption tax, disproportionately affecting low and middle income households.

He argues that the assumed benefits for domestic manufacturing are exaggerated, as many industries depend on global supply chains, which tariffs only disrupt.

Historical data supports the claim that tariffs are ultimately paid by consumers.

During the trade war in 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods, and studies showed that American importers—and, consequently, consumers bore nearly the entire cost.