Understanding foreign meddling in Iran's complex political crisis

PROTESTS in Iran and the possibility of the US and Israel attacking the country are causing widespread concern across the international community.

- DR RENEVA FOURIE

MEMBERS of the Basij volunteer Islamic militia burn US and Israeli flags during a protest in front of the British Embassy in Tehran on January 14. The Basij, linked to the Revolutionary Guards, are among the most devout supporters of the Iranian government. AFP

(AFP)

At the forefront of this situation are allegations of human rights violations against protesters by the Iranian government. These allegations have received significant attention from Western governments, media outlets and sections of the Iranian diaspora, often presented without sufficient context or historical grounding.

Violent and destructive protests cannot be tolerated, particularly when they are not supported by the vast majority of the population and when there is credible evidence of external influence and funding.

Such actions undermine social cohesion and threaten public safety. However, upholding the rule of law must occur with restraint. Excessive force and indiscriminate repression risk deepening social divisions and entrenching instability.

The experience of apartheid demonstrates that political discontent is most effectively addressed through engagement, even under highly constrained circumstances. Historical evidence shows that repression strengthens radicalisation and prolongs conflict rather than resolving underlying grievances.

While the Iranian state has a responsibility to maintain order, protect infrastructure and ensure the safety of its citizens, this responsibility must be exercised in a manner consistent with legal process and proportionality. Sustainable stability depends on restraint, dialogue and accountability, rather than policies that alienate sections of society.