War's Endless Cycle

The recent large-scale Israeli airstrike on Iran marks a dangerous escalation in a conflict that has simmered for decades, steeped in deep-rooted hostility and geopolitical intrigue.

- 

Israel's decision to launch these attacks reflects a long-standing fixation on Iran as an existential threat, a narrative that has shaped its foreign policy but also risks dragging the entire region into a more violent and unstable future. This latest strike, while framed by Israel as a necessary pre-emptive move, demands critical scrutiny—not only for its immediate consequences but also for the broader implications it carries for peace, regional sovereignty, and international law.

The animosity between Israel and Iran is no accident of recent politics; it is rooted in history, ideology, and the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which positioned Iran staunchly against Israel and its Western allies. Iran's leadership views Israel as a Western-backed colonial foothold in the Middle East, while Israel perceives Iran's growing influence and nuclear ambitions as an existential threat.

The shadow war between the two has seen covert operations, assassinations of scientists, cyberattacks, and proxy conflicts unfold across multiple countries. Yet, this prolonged cycle of violence reveals a dangerous pattern: both sides seem trapped in an endless loop of provocation and retaliation, leaving ordinary civilians caught in the crossfire.

Israel's narrative hinges on the assertion that Iran seeks nuclear weapons to annihilate the Jewish state. While Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful, its continued enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade levels understandably raises alarms.