Dave Whorton

My former colleagues helped create the modern VC model. Here's why I think there's a better way.

- 

These days, many founders feel pressure to raise tremendous amounts of venture capital. But it wasn’t always like this. Most people are surprised to learn that four of the most valuable companies in the world barely raised any venture capital at all by today’s standards. Apple is believed to have raised less than $1 million before its IPO. Amazon raised about $8 million. Microsoft raised about $1 million. Google raised $25 million. Add it all up, and it’s less than $35 million in total VC funding. Granted, that’s about $74 million in today’s dollars, but it’s still a relatively small investment that led to four companies that are worth around $14 trillion today.

Before billion-dollar VC rounds became common, there was a way of building companies that was capital efficient. I was there when it all changed, and I, too, came to believe that a growing company needed a massive VC war chest to succeed. Now I don’t, and you shouldn’t either.

The rise of get big fast

Our story begins when I was recruited to Kleiner Perkins by its legendary partner John Doerr in 1997. Amazon had just gone public. John was a proponent of “get big fast” (or “growth at all costs,” as it was later called). That playbook still exists.

I had gone to business school at Stanford with the idea that I wanted to start my own company, but I got very caught up in this world of venture capital and the get-big-fast model. There couldn’t have been a more exciting time than the three years I spent at Kleiner Perkins. The last major project I worked on was Google. John was the lead investor, and I was his right-hand guy. I was the one reviewing the term sheet with Larry and Sergey.