Risk of Exposure

Systematic age fraud threatens the future of Indian football / Sports

- Akarsh Sharma

In April 2019, as part of its preparations for the Asian under-16 championship this year, the Indian under-15 football team visited Italy for an “exposure tour.” In a press release, the All India Football Federation stated that its squad for matches against the United States, Mexico and Slovenia included players “born on or after January, 1 2004”—the cut-off date for the Asian championship. The team against Slovenia was captained by Eric Lalsangzuala, whose date of birth, according to the AIFF’s central registration system, is 15 June 2002, making him almost eighteen months too old. Lalsangzuala’s CRS entry had been approved by the AIFF on 20 November 2018, and could be readily accessed by AIFF officials, clubs, agents and scouts. His birth certificate was registered on 16 June 2002, confirming his overage status. This glaring oversight by the AIFF demonstrated its negligence towards the issue of age fraud, which continues to damage Indian football.

Exposure tours are a poor use of the substantial investment in Indian football over the past few years. Before the 2017 Under-17 World Cup, which India hosted, the AIFF spent crores of rupees on organising 17 such trips for the national team. This is a short-sighted strategy. Instead of investing in improving the state of the domestic game and laying the foundations for an organic pipeline of, say, ten thousand youth footballers, the AIFF chooses to chance its luck on a small group of players. It justifies this approach by focussing on isolated results, often inflating the significance of the results for greater publicity.