LAYFLAT VS. RIGID

CRUSADER HOSE BREAKS DOWN THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RIGID AND LAYFLAT HOSE SYSTEMS.

- 

Mine dewatering is a critical process in mining operations, ensuring water doesn’t interfere with excavation and impact productivity and safety.

There are two primary pipeline systems used for dewatering and water transfer: rigid hose systems and layflat hose systems.

While both systems get water from A to B, they differ significantly in their maintenance and ease of use.

Crusader Hose, an Australian manufacturer of layflat hose systems for mine dewatering, offers a comparison.

Maintenance requirements of rigid hoses

Rigid hose systems, typically made from steel or HDPE (high-density polyethylene), have long been used in mine dewatering.

Although these pipes provide a stable water transport system, they also offer extensive maintenance challenges.

Rigid hoses comprise metal pipes, which are prone to corrosion due to constant exposure to water, chemicals, and harsh mining conditions.

Scaling and mineral deposits can build up inside the pipes, reducing flow efficiency and requiring frequent cleaning.

Another challenge is the structural integrity of traditional hose systems.

Rigid hose systems are vulnerable to cracking, denting, and joint failures due to the movement of heavy equipment and ground shifts.