DO WE NEED LOW TRAFFIC NEIGHBOURHOODS?

As the Government orders a review of controversial low traffic we look at the arguments for and against them neighbourhoods,

- Alasdair Rodden

THERE'S A SAYING that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. And it's one that might ring especially true for many residents in low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) that have been rolled out around the country.

In principle, LTNs are a worthy endeavour, in that they're intended to reduce air pollution and make them safer places to walk and cycle by restricting access to motor vehicles.

However, they've been criticised for placing an unfair burden on local residents by increasing congestion on surrounding roads and disrupting access to homes and businesses.

These concerns have prompted the Government to order a review into the rollout of LTNS to assess their effectiveness. So, are they a help or a hindrance?

What is a low traffic neighbourhood?

In residential areas designated as LTNs, access to through traffic is restricted by using barriers or 'filters' (such as bollards, gates and planters), or via 'no motor vehicles' road signs. In the latter case, restrictions are typically enforced using automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras.

The stated aim is to prevent non-local drivers from using certain residential roads as shortcuts (also known as rat runs) during peak travel times, while still allowing full access to pedestrians and cyclists.

The restrictions typically apply to all private and commercial vehicles, although emergency services vehicles are exempt.

Why were LTNs introduced?