The decision tree of life is colossal. While physicists and metaphysicians explore the possibility that the multiverse grows larger at every decision, it is the ethicist's lot to consider the paths chosen. That is to say, ethics is generally concerned with the build-up to a decision point. But what happens afterwards? And how do our choices influence our future decision-making? T After a decision has been made and acted upon, the person who made it may be satisfied with the intention, the process, and the outcome. Alternatively, they could be dissatisfied or they could be indifferent.
I wonder if being happy after a decision is the least interesting of these states? This attitude seems almost transactional: Was the objective achieved? Tick. Smile. Move on. On the other hand, being merely nonchalant about the outcome could reflect any of several mentalities, from perceiving the decision as insignificant, to a healthy detachment, to an unhealthy detachment. But perhaps the most nuanced and philosophically rewarding state to examine is dissatisfaction. The feelings stimulated by recognising a decision to have been bad can be intense, difficult to shake off, and complexly woven. There are subtly yet distinctly different possibilities within this set: dissatisfaction itself, disappointment, regret, grief, and potentially, remorse. The way we process any of these emotions will be due to our personal history, and can change our future behaviour.
However, as has been intuited by some philosophers and evidenced by modern neuroscientific research (see for example 'Neural Foundations for Regret-Based Decision Making', Revue d'Economie Politique, 118:1, p.63, Ambrosino et al, 2008), the most powerful of the post-decision emotions appears to be regret.
This story is from the December 2022 / January 2023 edition of Philosophy Now.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the December 2022 / January 2023 edition of Philosophy Now.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
"Stand Out Of My Light"
Sophie Dibben watches Alexander the Great meet Diogenes the Cynic.
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
Hilarius Bogbinder looks at a man who wanted to make Peace from Warre.
The Philosophy of Work
Alessandro Colarossi has insights for the bored and understimulated.
Towards Love
George Mason on love as shared identity.
Hume's Problem of Induction
Patrick Brissey exposes a major unprovable assumption at the core of science.
A Philosophical History of Transhumanism
John Kennedy Philip goes deep into the search for (post-) human heights.
How to Have a Good Life
Meena Danishmal asks if Seneca's account of the good life is really practical.
Horseplay in Hibernia
Seán Moran explores equine escapades in Eire and elsewhere.
Philosophy & Hurling: Thinking & Playing
Stiofán Ó Murchadha knowing how we know.
Philip Pettit & The Birth of Ethics
Peter Stone thinks about a thought experiment about how ethics evolved.