
My friend Sukrit invited me to M'India.
His mother lived in Delhi. He said I should get out of England and give my eyes something new to look at. He wouldn't be there-he was trapped in a biology lab at Stanford-but his mother would look after me. I could stay as long as I liked.
The invitation confused me. I could not imagine why I would go to a country that was not my country, to live with a mother who was not my mother.
I pawed at the idea, then dismissed it.
I did not want to go east; I wanted to go west. I was waiting for my family to reclaim me.
I don't know where the hope lived or what it lived on. I had been estranged from my father for a year by then, but I was still telling myself that the estrangement was temporary, that the breach would heal. My mother was key.
I thought she would convince my father, soften his heart. That's how it happens in the Bible, when two souls fall out of kinship. God softens a heart. I wasn't religious, not the way my father had raised me to be, but I believed in the softening of hearts. So I waited.
For a letter. A phone call. I imagined my father saying, "Come home." Of course I could not go to India. When my father called, I had to be ready.
Months passed. The seasons changed.
I wrote my mother every few weeks and she answered. She wrote as if everything were all right, as if we were not estranged. She told me about her days, her shopping trips with my sister, the steady expansion of her herbal business. From these lines of text, I extracted the sensation of being a daughter.
Then another year had passed with silence from my father. It was difficult, then, to keep believing that we would reconcile, but equally difficult to give up that belief. I did not know how to live with the loss of my parents, or the bitterness that the loss was introducing into my life.
I must have seemed bewildered.
This story is from the February 17-24, 2025 (Double Issue) edition of The New Yorker.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the February 17-24, 2025 (Double Issue) edition of The New Yorker.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In

THE FRENZY Joyce Carol Oates
Early afternoon, driving south on the Garden State Parkway with the girl beside him.

UPDATED KENNEDY CENTER 2025 SCHEDULE
April 1—A. R. Gurney’s “Love Letters,” with Lauren Boebert and Kid Rock

YOU MAD, BRO?
Young men have gone MAGA. Can the left win them back?

ONWARD AND UPWARD WITH THE ARTS BETTING ON THE FUTURE
Lucy Dacus after boygenius.

STEAL, ADAPT, BORROW
Jonathan Anderson transformed Loewe by radically reinterpreting classic garments. Is Dior next?

JUST BETWEEN US
The pleasures and pitfalls of gossip.

INHERIT THE PLAY
The return of “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “Ghosts.”

LEAVE WITH DESSERT
Graydon Carter’s great magazine age.

INTERIORS
The tyranny of taste in Vincenzo Latronico’s “Perfection.”

Naomi Fry on Jay McInerney's "Chloe's Scene"
As a teen-ager, long before I lived in New York, I felt the city urging me toward it. N.Y.C., with its art and money, its drugs and fashion, its misery and elation—how tough, how grimy, how scary, how glamorous! For me, one of its most potent siren calls was “Chloe’s Scene,” a piece written for this magazine, in 1994, by the novelist Jay McInerney, about the then nineteen-year-old sometime actress, sometime model, and all-around It Girl Chloë Sevigny.