Any overzealous, though well-meaning, judicial intervention may lead to unforeseen and unin-tended consequences...” This was part of the Centre’s recent submission to the Supreme Court when it was asked about the differential vaccination policy across age groups in the country. As the second wave of the pandemic raged across India, and caught the executive with its pants down, the judiciary stepped into the vacuum. The apex court and several High Courts have been passing orders to ensure better management of the pandemic. Whether it is vaccination or bed allocation, availability of oxygen or the drug tocilizumab, some judge has passed a stricture, told an authority to “beg, borrow, steal” or pulled up those incharge for contempt.
Here is a sampling of what has been happening across virtual courtrooms over the past few weeks: The Allahabad High Court asked the Uttar Pradesh government to fix a “minimum” ex gratia of ₹1 crore for every official who succumbed to the pandemic because of panchayat election duty; the ₹30 lakh the state government had announced was too little. The Kerala High Court ordered a ceiling on charges in private hospitals for Covid-19 treatment. The Delhi High Court has been almost micromanaging pandemic management, fixing oxygen quota and distribution. It even issued a contempt notice to the Centre on the oxygen issue, which the Supreme Court dismissed. The Uttarakhand High Court pulled up the state government for allowing the Kumbh Mela to go ahead against scientific advice, and then, for not following standard operating procedures.
The mountain of public interest litigations also points to administrative lapses at the government level, leading to injustices, said Ranbir Singh, former vice chancellor of the National Law University.
The courts’ intervention began as a response to an immediate problem. Over time, however, the courts have found themselves in territory where they have neither scientific nor administrative expertise. As one lawyer said, there was a situation where lawyers, and not medical experts, were comparing the benefits of dexamethasone over remdesivir.
So, has the judiciary waded deep into a mire that even medical and administrative experts are wary of?
When it came to the distribution of vaccines, the Centre finally made a stern submission: “In the context of a global pandemic, where the response and strategy of the nation are completely driven by expert medical and scientific opinion, there is even little room for judicial interference.”
It added that, in the absence of administrative experience or expert advice, such interference could leave the doctors, scientists, experts and executive little room to find innovative solutions on the go.
Continue reading your story on the app
Continue reading your story in the magazine
Mantra could bridge the global disparity in access to robotic surgeries
A mighty roar
Will Newton director Amit Masurkar score another Oscar entry with his next, Sherni?
ALL HEAT, NO DUST
The Gehlot-Pilot tussle is again on the boil, but political constraints prevent both from drastic moves
Covid-induced automation in industries can be a double-edged sword
Mughlai chicken à la robot
These entrepreneurs are redefining our culinary future, bot by bot
India claims he is still Indian. Fugitive diamond trader Mehul Choksi claims he is an Antiguan citizen. Dominica has to decide and, possibly, set a precedent for runaway fraudsters
DISEASE OF DISHARMONY
The pandemic has worsened the already strained relations between the Centre and state governments
SEDUCED BY THE STAGE
After an Oscar nomination and a Cannes win, Antonio Banderas is going back to his Spanish roots—and, theatre
Would have been nice if we had a WTC in my days
Sachin Tendulkar, former cricketer
How The Pandemic Will Be The Game Changer For Robotics In India
The need for robots was never felt more than during this pandemic—for companionship, domestic help or medical assistance. The race is on to create more socially intelligent robots, and Indian players are populating the field